http://www.keywee.co.uk/archives/2701 Residential Landlord and Tenant Legal Information Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:12:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.keywee.co.uk/archives/2701/comment-page-1#comment-107 admin Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:41:42 +0000 http://www.keywee.co.uk/?p=2701#comment-107 It really must be in the DPS and no other scheme. Draycott established that the 14 day rule does not apply to DPS. However, there is no such case for other schemes. In addition, the other two schemes have different wording which appear to try and avoid Draycott by specifically saying their initial requirements require the deposit be protected within 14 days and are therefore different wording to the DPS. (MyDeposits rules suggest they might accept late protection with consent and an additional fee being paid and other conditions.) It really must be in the DPS and no other scheme. Draycott established that the 14 day rule does not apply to DPS. However, there is no such case for other schemes. In addition, the other two schemes have different wording which appear to try and avoid Draycott by specifically saying their initial requirements require the deposit be protected within 14 days and are therefore different wording to the DPS. (MyDeposits rules suggest they might accept late protection with consent and an additional fee being paid and other conditions.)

]]> http://www.keywee.co.uk/archives/2701/comment-page-1#comment-106 David Boyle Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:27:24 +0000 http://www.keywee.co.uk/?p=2701#comment-106 So if you were facing a potential claim would it matter if the deposit was then protected in any of the other schemes or does it have to be with the DPS. So if you were facing a potential claim would it matter if the deposit was then protected in any of the other schemes or does it have to be with the DPS.

]]>